Go on then...

[secretagent]

...Have another

HABIT

[labouch]

secretagent said:

...Have another

HABIT

I liked this. Is this the finished article?

[spoonz]

I really like that.

Not sure if it's just because it's Mp3 but the audio quality wasn't that great. Would like to hear it in a higher clarity format to appreciatte the sounds in there.

[dlm21uk]

Yeah liked that too. I agree with Colin though, a better quality version would be good to bring out those lovely sounds

[secretagent]

labouch said:

I liked this. Is this the finished article?

Every time i listen to it i think "oh i could add that here or this there" but that has been one of my biggest problems adding and adding till i just get a mess(the track"scream" i sent to shaun had about 30 seperate un-sequenced tracks on it )

[secretagent]

spoonz said:

Not sure if it's just because it's Mp3 but the audio quality wasn't that great. Would like to hear it in a higher clarity format to appreciatte the sounds in there.

Amazingly that is one area that i think i have improved on,you should of heard some of the earlier stuff #uhhhh#

Does this one sound worse(soundwise) than the last 2 i've posted?

[spoonz]

No it's not worse.

Mp3 does compress the audio so i'm not saying your mix is bad just that it sounds like it's been compressed and lost quality as a result.

If you listen to your drums it's especially evident there.

I'm no expert where audio is concerned but Shaun might be able to say what's going on.

You don't need to add anything to it content wise in my opinion. It's good as it is.
I think Andy might have been reffering to the audio not the song itself.

[Dubsounds]

Good song Martin but your EQ is what's causing the clarity issues, not the arrangement.

[Gavin]

Audio quality sounds fine to me. #confused02#