|
|
Post by Minimoog on Sept 22, 2010 10:44:25 GMT
I'll see your Roland Matt and raise you a Voyager XL...  |
|
|
|
Post by nervejam on Sept 22, 2010 12:01:58 GMT
Hmm.. No hotlinking. Naughty boy..  |
|
|
|
Post by Minimoog on Sept 22, 2010 12:49:01 GMT
Fixed.
|
|
|
|
Post by Polymoog Lover on Sept 22, 2010 13:01:14 GMT
Jesus..... look at that thing! That had better be polyphonic!
|
|
|
|
Post by Minimoog on Sept 22, 2010 13:39:37 GMT
That had better be polyphonic! #nononono# |
|
|
|
Post by Polymoog Lover on Sept 22, 2010 19:01:25 GMT
Well, let's think about this for a minute.... Monophonic synthesizers are great! I love them and some could not possibly be made polyphonic.... but it's about time Moog gave it another shot, right? I mean, they'd certainly broaden their player base! I'm not saying that Mono is better then Poly, or vice-versa, I'm just saying, rather than milking the Voyager franchise (yet again) perhaps they should bring something new to the table.....
|
|
|
|
Post by martymoog on Sept 22, 2010 20:04:28 GMT
Oh lordy that looks good !!!
|
|
|
|
Post by Tokyohunter on Sept 29, 2010 12:57:33 GMT
There has been recent rumors of a "slim phatty" coming soonish and also prior to that they were supposedly working on doing a polyphonic synth again.
I think this XL version is probably as expensive as they can go for a monophonic synth.
They would probably sell more polyphonic synths than XLs but probably there would be canilbalisation of sales from people who just want a Moog, whether mono or poly.
|
|
